The Org Chart Is Designed to Create the Misunderstandings You Then Hold Meetings to Fix

April 20, 2026

Deutsch / English

We structure organizations around expertise because deep specialization produces better outcomes within a domain. That part is true. The part nobody says out loud is that deep specialization also makes people systematically unable to understand each other.

A backend engineer and a product designer are not just doing different work. They are operating with different mental models of what the product is, what users do with it, and what "done" means. Those models were built in entirely separate contexts and were never reconciled. The org chart made that separation official.

The same dynamic plays out at a different scale when an organization tries to serve multiple products or expand into new markets. Teams that built something for one type of customer carry deep assumptions about what that product is for. When leadership decides to go after a different segment, those assumptions do not disappear - they stay embedded in every prioritization decision, every architecture tradeoff, every instinct about what counts as good work.

A B2B SaaS company that grew up serving small teams knows exactly what its product does. It does not know how to be enterprise-ready. Enterprise customers want different pricing models, different service levels, different contractual guarantees. The work required to get there is real and expensive. And inside an org whose mental model was built around a different customer, that work looks like a distraction. It gets deprioritized. The market expansion stalls - not because the opportunity was wrong, but because the organization could not update its picture of what it was building and for whom.

Then we respond to all of this with cross-functional meetings, embedded PMs, alignment rituals. We create overhead to repair a structural problem we deliberately built in.

The overhead does not fix the structure. It manages the symptoms. The alternative is not flat organizations or constant collaboration. It is designing explicitly for the moments when different expertise - or different market realities - has to actually meet and change something, not just get acknowledged and filed away.

Thoughts? Find me on Bluesky.