Overpaying One Instead of Building a Bench of Ten Is a Trap.

July 17, 2026

Deutsch / English

When a rare combination of skills gets scarce, companies do one of two things. Build the bench that produces the skill internally, patiently, over years. Or bid for the one person in the market who already has it. The bidding is faster. The bench is cheaper, but it takes time to build momentum. The market is pricing the bidding right now, which means everyone considering hiring AI-native product managers or SaaS enterprise sales guys for 200k/year right now is quietly deciding to skip the bench.

The math looks fine on a spreadsheet: One elite hire is cheaper than ten mid-tier hires who might, in three years, produce one elite. The failure mode is not the cost. It is in one of three things:

Every wave of talent scarcity in tech has been broken this way for decades, and every wave has produced the same aftermath: a company overpaid for a superstar & the superstar left. The specialized skill has become a commodity. Or obsolete. The current AI-native product manager or SaaS enterprise sales guy premium is going to run the same play.

The bench prevents this kind of failure. The bench is an insurance policy. The market thinks insurance is boring. The market has been wrong about that before.

It's time to build a bench.

Thoughts? Find me on Bluesky.